4.7 Article

Metal versus plastic stents for anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 131-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.013

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Biliary anastomotic stricture occurs in 15% to 20% of patients after deceased orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). It is usually treated endoscopically with multiple plastic stents (MPSs), although the use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (cSEMSs) is emerging. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of cSEMSs versus MPSs in these patients. Methods: A single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial was performed. Patients were randomized to single cSEMSs for 6 months or to MPS placement, exchanged every 3 months over 1 year. The primary outcome was stricture resolution. Crossover therapy was considered for failure or recurrence. Secondary outcomes were sustained improvement, morbidity, and mortality. Results: Between October 2009 and January 2014, 162 patients with post-OLT biliary adverse events were assessed for eligibility. Sixty-four were prospectively randomized (1:1) to cSEMSs or MPSs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Technical success was 100%. Median follow-up was 36.4 and 32.9 months for the cSEMS and MPS groups, stricture resolution at last stent removal was achieved in 83.3% and 96.5% (P = .19), and stricture recurrence was observed in 32% and 0%, respectively (P = .01). Adverse events occurred in 23.3% and 6.4% of ERCPs in the cSEMS and MPS groups, respectively (P = .01), with 13.3% of acute pancreatitis in the cSEMS group and 2.1% in the MPS group (P = .01). Conclusions: cSEMSs were comparable with MPSs regarding post-OLT biliary anastomotic stricture resolution. cSEMSs allowed fewer procedures and had a positive effect on cost. Duration of treatment with cSEMSs should be further investigated. Sphincterotomy should be considered for all patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available