4.7 Article

Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 1339-1344

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.029

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is important in the diagnosis of early gastric cancers (EGCs) but requires expertise to master. We developed a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system to assist endoscopists in identifying and delineating EGCs. Methods: We retrospectively collected and randomly selected 66 EGC M-NBI images and 60 non-cancer M-NBI images into a training set and 61 EGC M-NBI images and 20 non-cancer M-NBI images into a test set. After preprocessing and partition, we determined 8 gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features for each partitioned 40 x 40 pixel block and calculated a coefficient of variation of 8 GLCM feature vectors. We then trained a support vector machine (SVMLv1) based on variation vectors from the training set and examined in the test set. Furthermore, we collected 2 determined P and Q GLCM feature vectors from cancerous image blocks containing irregular microvessels from the training set, and we trained another SVM (SVMLv2) to delineate cancerous blocks, which were compared with expert-delineated areas for area concordance. Results: The diagnostic performance revealed accuracy of 96.3%, precision (positive predictive value [PPV]) of 98.3%, recall (sensitivity) of 96.7%, and specificity of 95%, at a rate of 0.41 +/- 0.01 seconds per image. The performance of area concordance, on a block basis, demonstrated accuracy of 73.8% +/- 10.9%, precision (PPV) of 75.3% +/- 20.9%, recall (sensitivity) of 65.5% +/- 19.9%, and specificity of 80.8% +/- 17.1%, at a rate of 0.49 +/- 0.04 seconds per image. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that our CADx system has great potential in real-time diagnosis and delineation of EGCs in M-NBI images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available