4.5 Article

Tissue Engineered Constructs: Perspectives on Clinical Translation

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 796-804

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1280-0

Keywords

Tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs); Bioethics; Regulatory issues; Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Medical devices; Commercialization

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR056212] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB003060] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a bedside to bench and back approach for developing tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs) for clinical applications is reviewed. The driving force behind this approach is unmet clinical needs. Preclinical research, both in vitro and in vivo using small and large animal models, will help find solutions to key research questions. In clinical research, ethical issues regarding the use of cells and tissues, their sources, donor consent, as well as clinical trials are important considerations. Regulatory issues, at both institutional and government levels, must be addressed prior to the translation of TEMPs to clinical practice. TEMPs are regulated as drugs, biologics, devices, or combination products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Depending on the mode of regulation, applications for TEMP introduction must be filed with the FDA to demonstrate safety and effectiveness in premarket clinical studies, followed by 510(k) premarket clearance or premarket approval (for medical devices), biologics license application approval (for biologics), or new drug application approval (for drugs). A case study on nerve cuffs is presented to illustrate the regulatory process. Finally, perspectives on commercialization such as finding a company partner and funding issues, as well as physician culture change, are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available