4.4 Article

Toward a Better Understanding of What Makes Positive Psychology Interventions Work: Predicting Happiness and Depression From the Person X Intervention Fit in a Follow-Up after 3.5 Years

Journal

APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 108-128

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12039

Keywords

depression; happiness; personxintervention fit; positive psychology; positive psychology interventions; well-being

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [100014_132512, 100014_149772]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Robust evidence exists that positive psychology interventions are effective in enhancing well-being and ameliorating depression. Comparatively little is known about the conditions under which they work best. Models describing characteristics that impact the effectiveness of positive interventions typically contain features of the person, of the activity, and the fit between the two. This study focuses on indicators of the personxintervention fit in predicting happiness and depressive symptoms 3.5 years after completion of the intervention. Methods: A sample of 165 women completed measures for happiness and depressive symptoms before and about 3.5 years after completion of a positive intervention (random assignment to one out of nine interventions, which were aggregated for the analyses). Four fit indicators were assessed: Preference; continued practice; effort; and early reactivity. Results: Three out of four personxintervention fit indicators were positively related to happiness or negatively related to depression when controlled for the pretest scores. Together, they explained 6 per cent of the variance in happiness, and 10 per cent of the variance of depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Most tested indicators of a personxintervention fit are robust predictors of happiness and depressive symptomseven after 3.5 years. They might serve for an early estimation of the effectiveness of a positive intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available