4.7 Article

Influence of oil and gas field operations on spatial and temporal distributions of atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons and their effect on ozone formation in winter

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 3527-3542

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-3527-2015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Wyoming School of Energy Resources
  2. Pinedale Anticline Project Office
  3. MAPA project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emissions from oil and natural gas development during winter in the Upper Green River basin of Wyoming are known to drive episodic ozone (O-3) production. Contrasting O-3 distributions were observed in the winters of 2011 and 2012, with numerous episodes (hourly O-3 >= 85 ppbv) in 2011 compared to none in 2012. The lack of O-3 episodes in 2012 coincided with a reduction in measured ambient levels of total non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC). Measurements of speciated NMHC, and other air quality parameters, were performed to better understand emission sources and to determine which compounds are most active in promoting O-3 formation. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analyses of the data were carried out to help achieve these goals. PMF analyses revealed three contributing factors that were identified with different emission source types: factor 1, combustion/traffic; factor 2, fugitive natural gas; and factor 3, fugitive condensate. Compositional signatures of the three contributing factors were identified through comparison with independently derived emission source profiles. Fugitive emissions of natural gas and of condensate were the two principal emission source types for NMHC. A water treatment and recycling facility was found to be a significant source of NMHC that are abundant in condensate, in particular toluene and m+p-xylene. Emissions from water treatment have an influence upon peak O-3 mixing ratios at downwind measurement sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available