4.1 Article

Some Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Interaction Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making

Journal

FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE
Volume 159, Issue 4, Pages 385-428

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2018-1669

Keywords

Multiple attribute decision making; Pythagorean fuzzy numbers; Pythagorean fuzzy interaction weighted average (PFIWA) operator; Pythagorean fuzzy interaction weighted geometric (PFIWG) operator; power arithmetic aggregation operators; power geometric aggregation operators; service outsourcing provider; communications industry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Then, we utilize arithmetic and geometric operations to develop some Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators: Pythagorean fuzzy interaction weighted average (PFIWA) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction weighted geometric (PFIWG) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction ordered weighted average (PFIOWA) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction ordered weighted geometric (PFIOWG) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction hybrid average (PFIHA) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction hybrid geometric (PFIHG) operator, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction correlate aggregation operators, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction induced aggregation operators, Pythagorean fuzzy interaction induced correlate aggregation operators, Pythagorean fuzzy interactive power arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators. The prominent characteristic of these proposed operators are studied. Then, we have utilized these operators to develop some approaches to solve the Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. Finally, a practical example for selecting the service outsourcing provider of communications industry is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available