4.7 Article

Evaluation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers as a new type of diesel additives

Journal

FUEL
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages 135-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.007

Keywords

Physical properties; Diesel; Measurements; Theoretical modelling; PODEn

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576285, 21776300, 21276271]
  2. Innovation Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [ZX20160004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEn) is an emerging biofuel that has a great potential to become one of the competitive alternative fuels for diesel engine. In the present study, systematic studies were made to evaluate the influences of PODEn on the physical fuel properties that are routinely used to define the quality of diesel fuels. Such fuel properties were measured for the three (diesel + PODEn) mixtures, diesels, and PODE(n. )The measured properties included cetane number, lubricity, density, viscosity, solidifying point, cold filter plugging point, flash point, and heat capacity. Comparisons of measured properties of the mixtures and their individual components were made to achieve the following purposes: First, to reveal the changes in the properties of diesels upon the addition of PODEn and in the properties of the (diesel + PODEn) mixtures as the weight percent of PODE(n )is increased; Second, to see whether or not the addition of PODEn worsens the properties of diesels, in particular, whether or not the measured values of the (diesel + PODEn) mixtures exceed the standard values set by the Beijing-VI. Novel theoretical equations were developed to quantitatively predict the density, viscosity, and heat capacity of the (diesel + PODEn) mixtures in terms of the corresponding properties of the diesel and PODEn. Comparisons were made between measured and predicted properties and the agreements are excellent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available