3.8 Article

How Teachers' Knowledge of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Makes Difference in Doctors' Diagnostic Decisions and Management?

Journal

SAUDI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 151-157

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1658-631X.156430

Keywords

Action knowledge; ADHD (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder); Saudi Arabia

Funding

  1. Administration of Department of Family and community Medicine in the University of Dammam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The teacher's knowledge plays a key role in the process of assessing, screening, and diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. This was a cross-sectional study aimed at surveying teachers' knowledge about attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, one of the most prevailing neurodevelopmental disorders. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirteen female elementary school teachers were randomly chosen from six regular female public and private schools in Al-Khobar in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. They completed a self-reported questionnaire on their general factual knowledge of the nature of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and the management action knowledge of the condition. Factors which might affect their knowledge were also examined. Results: About 48.7% of the total sample had adequate factual knowledge, but only 27 (23.9%) showed adequate action knowledge about how to deal with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Teachers' knowledge of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (factual and action) was not significantly correlated with their years of experience, level of education (qualification) and duration of training in educational methodology. Conclusion: It was concluded that teachers in female primary schools had inadequate knowledge about attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Implications and recommendation for health and educational professional are outlined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available