4.3 Article

Fast defect detection for various types of surfaces using random forest with VOV features

Publisher

KOREAN SOC PRECISION ENG
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-015-0125-y

Keywords

Defect detection; Surface inspection; Random forest; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through NRF - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2013R1A1A2060427, 2011-0017228]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [C0138997] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2060427, 2011-0017228] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defect detection on an object surface is one of the most important tasks of an automated visual inspection system. The most modern defect detection systems are required to operate in real-time and handle high-resolution images. One of main difficulties in system applications is that it cannot be used for general inspection of various types of surface without tuning the internal parameters. In this paper, we demonstrate how to solve the problem mentioned above by using simple variance profile values of pixel intensities and applying it to the random-forest-based machine learning algorithm. Variance of Variance (VOV) profiles are used to describe the texture of an object surface and to amplify the irregularity of intensity variations. The feature amplification property of the VOV method can be applied generally to various types of surface and defect. For effective learning and reduction of false detection, a defect-size insensitive approach and a hard sample retraining process are introduced. The experimental results demonstrate reliable defect detection for various surface types without changing parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available