4.7 Article

Theoretical study of the CO formation mechanism in the CO2 gasification of lignite

Journal

FUEL
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages 353-362

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.030

Keywords

CO2 gasification; CO; Lignite; Mechanism; Carbon transformation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506047, U1361212]
  2. Hebei Province Department of Education [ZD2016068]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics of Chinese Academy of Sciences [SKLMRD-K201601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive force field (ReaxFF) molecular dynamics simulations of lignite and lignite-CO2 models were performed to investigate the CO formation mechanism of CO2 gasification process of lignite. A C++ program was developed to assess ReaxFF trajectories and to analyze elementary reactions involved in the mechanism. Calculated product distribution and relative amounts of main gas products show good agreement with reported experimental observations. We found that the CO formation pathways in the CO2 gasification of lignite begin with the chain carbon radical (R-n), which is formed by C-H/C-C bond cleavage reactions of aromatic moieties in the lignite or produced semicoke at high temperatures. These chain carbon radicals can react with CO2, forming oxidized carbon radicals, such as R-n-O-C-O, R-n-CO2 and R-n-O. Among these radicals, R-n-O and R-n-O-C-O are important precursors of CO. They produce CO molecules by releasing their C-O moieties at the end. The thermodynamic properties of these elementary reactions were obtained by density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP/6-311 + G(2d,2p) level. The calculated overall enthalpy and entropy changes could clearly explain the experimental data. The density functional theory results show that most of these elementary reactions are endothermic and entropy increasing. High gasification temperatures are favorable for the reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available