4.6 Review

More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 146-169

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001

Keywords

Acute stress; Chronic stress; Daily stress; Emotions; Affect; Appraisals; Motivational states; Emotional contagion; Measurement; Allostatic load

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIA R24 AG048024]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K01AG057859, R24AG048024] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because stress is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as stress. Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement acute, event-based, daily, and chronic - and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available