4.4 Article

Improving Primary Teachers' Attitudes Toward Science by Attitude-Focused Professional Development

Journal

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 710-734

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21218

Keywords

attitude towards science; inquiry; primary teachers; science education; professional development; training

Funding

  1. Platform Beta Technology in The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a description of a novel, attitude-focused, professional development intervention, and presents the results of an experimental pretest-posttest control group study investigating the effects of this intervention on primary teachers' personal attitudes toward science, attitudes toward teaching science, and their science teaching behavior. The training course integrated an explicit focus on attitudes towards (teaching) science with an inquiry-based learning approach and refrained from recipe-like, pre-structured, and content-based instruction examples. Results show that the training course had profound positive effects on primary teachers' professional attitude towards teaching science. Teachers improved in self-efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching, felt less dependent on context factors, and enjoyed science teaching more. In addition, the training course had positive effects on teachers' personal attitude towards science, including improved self-efficacy and relevance beliefs, and decreased anxiety. Furthermore, there was a large effect on teachers' science teaching behavior in the classroom and on the number of science related activities they engaged in during their personal lives. These results show that an attitude-focused approach is more effective in changing teachers' attitudes and science teaching behavior compared to merely being engaged in science teaching. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 52: 710-734, 2015.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available