4.3 Article

Pulsed electromagnetic fields inhibit bone loss in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 258-266

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0439-z

Keywords

Pulsed electromagnetic fields; Diabetes mellitus; Streptozotocin; RANKL/OPG; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling

Funding

  1. Health Department of Hunan Province, China [B2014-052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidences have shown that pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) can partially prevent bone loss in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. However, the precise mechanisms accounting for these favorable effects are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of PEMFs on bone mass and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in STZ rats. Thirty 3-month-old Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into the following three groups (n = 10): control group (injection of saline vehicle), DM group (injection of STZ), and PEMFs group (injection of STZ+ PEMFs exposure). One week following injection of STZ, rats in the PEMFs group were subject to PEMFs stimulus for 40 min/day, 5 days/week, and lasted for 12 weeks. After 12 week intervention, the results showed that PEMFs increased serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase level and bone mineral density, and inhibited deterioration of bone microarchitecture and strength in STZ rats. Furthermore, PEMFs up-regulated the mRNA expressions of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5, beta-catenin and runtrelated gene 2 (Runx2), and down-regulated dickkopf1 in STZ rats. However, mRNA expressions of RANKL and OPG were not affected by PEMFs. PEMFs can prevent the diabetes-induced bone loss and reverse the deterioration of bone microarchitecture and strength by restoring Runx2 expression through regulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, regardless of its no glucose lowering effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available