4.5 Article

Construction and forensic genetic characterization of 11 autosomal haplotypes consisting of 22 tri-allelic indels

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 71-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.001

Keywords

Tri-allelic; Indels; Haplotype; Forensic genetics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [81571861, 81630054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels), which combine the advantages of both short tandem repeats and single-nucleotide polymorphisms, are suitable for parentage testing. To overcome the limitations of the low polymorphism of di-allelic indels, we constructed a set of haplotypes with physically linked, multi-allelic indels. Candidate haplotypes were selected from the 1000 Genomes Project database, and were subject to the following criteria for inclusion: (i) each marker must have a minimum allele frequency (MAF) of >= 0.1 in the Han population of China; (ii) markers must exist in a non-coding region; (iii) the physical distance between a pair of candidate indels must be < 500 bp; (iv) the allele length variation of each indel from 1 to 20 bp; (v) different haplotypes must be located on different chromosomes or chromosomal arms, or be more than 10 Mb apart if on the same chromosomal arm; and (vi) they must not be located across a recombination hotspot. A multiplex system with 11 haplotype markers, comprising 22 tri-allelic indel loci distributed over 10 chromosomes was developed. To validate the multiplex panel, we investigated the haplotype distribution in sets of two and three-generation pedigrees. The results demonstrated that the haplotypes consisting of multi-allelic indel markers exhibited higher polymorphism than a single indel locus, and thus provide Supplementary information for forensic kinship identification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available