4.5 Article

Simultaneous determination of 18 psychoactive agents and 6 metabolites in plasma using LC-MS/MS and application to actual plasma samples from conscription candidates

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages 283-290

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.024

Keywords

Psychoactive agents; Simultaneous analysis; LC-MS/MS; Method validation; Conscription candidates

Funding

  1. R&D fund from National Forensic Service of Korea [2017-Forensic Toxicology-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Korea, an increasing number of people attempt to evade military conscription by posing as mental health patients. To verify the authenticity of mental illness, there is a need to detect wide range of psychoactive agents in biological specimens of conscription candidates. In this study, we developed and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous determination of 18 psychoactive agents and 6 metabolites in human plasma. The method was characterized by the use of a simple, fast and cheap protein precipitation as sample preparation, a rapid run time (11 min) and a low volume of plasma sample (200 mu L). The analytes were monitored under the scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (sMRM) positive and negative mode using electrospray ionization (ESI). The essential validation parameters including selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, matrix effect and recovery were satisfactory. The limit of detection ranged from 0.0005 to 0.001 mu g/mL, and limit of quantitation ranged from 0.005 to 0.025 mu g/mL. The developed method was successfully applied to 323 actual plasma samples submitted by Korea central physical examination center of military manpower administration in 2016, and is expected to contribute to the rapid and accurate disposition of military service. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available