4.7 Article

Mimicking gluten functionality with β-conglycinin concentrate: Evaluation in gluten free yeast-leavened breads

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 64-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.055

Keywords

beta-Conglycinin; Soy proteins; Gluten-free bread; Corn starch; Structure; Hydration

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2014-52928-C2-1-R]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [2017/189]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  4. IATA-CSIC
  5. Tecnologico de Monterrey
  6. CONACyT [375643]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fractionation of soy proteins has proved to produce protein concentrates with viscoelastic properties. In the present study, a beta-conglycinin concentrate (beta CC) obtained by a pH fractionation of soy flour was tested as structuring agent in gluten-free yeast-leavened bread model. A lean formulation with beta CC and corn starch was used to produce gluten-free breads with two hydration conditions and three levels of protein (5%, 10% and 15%). Vital gluten was used to compare the functionality of beta CC protein and its performance for breadmaking. Breads were characterized in moisture, color, textural parameters and image analysis. beta CC presented lower hydration properties and higher emulsifying activity compared to vital gluten. Blends beta CC:starch had higher water binding capacity compared to vital gluten blends. The hydration conditions tested affected the moisture, color and cell density of breads. Breads produced with beta CC presented higher 2D area and height and presented higher crumb softness and cohesiveness, and did not present significant differences in springiness and resilience compared to vital gluten breads. The image analysis of crumbs showed higher cell density but lower porosity and mean cell areas in beta CC breads. Thus, beta CC proved to have potential as a structuring agent in gluten-free breads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available