4.6 Article

Using residents' perceptions research to inform planning and management for sustainable tourism: a study of the Gold Coast Schoolies Week, a contentious tourism event

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 660-682

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2014.991398

Keywords

resident attitudes; Schoolies Week; events; social exchange theory; sustainable tourism management; recommendations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential for resident attitude surveys to reduce the negative community impacts of tourism is constrained by their emphasis on closed-ended cognitive statements requiring simplistic numeric responses. This paper explores ways to obtain and analyze open-ended survey outputs from 791 residents in order to develop effective prescriptive recommendations for reducing the negative impacts, and increasing positive impacts from Australia's Gold Coast Schoolies Week (GCSW), a contentious event associated with widespread, high-risk antisocial behavior. Thematic content analysis revealed super-themes of unambivalent opposition to GCSW (22.0%) and support (7.3%), but also three super-themes that are conditional. Mitigative prevention (49.8%) includes supervision, alcohol/predator restrictions, spatial/temporal containment and dispersal themes, while mitigative enhancement (14.1%) includes constructive diversion, education and balanced media coverage themes. Mitigative justice (7.3%) is dominated by rule enforcement. The outcomes indicate support for social exchange theory in the expression of strategies through which those exchanges occur. The mitigative super-themes inform a research-based template for sustainably managing both GCSW and other contentious tourism-related events elsewhere. Using Tosun's three-stage citizen's participation hierarchy, support was indicated for the induced participation middle ground of consultation, with little support for top-down coercive participation, or for the citizen control of spontaneous participation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available