Journal
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 834-841Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.055
Keywords
Propolis; Phenolics; Folin-Ciocalteau; Extraction methodology
Categories
Funding
- SIDEO-Cooperation Programa of the Centre for Development Cooperation of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The analysis of propolis is controversial, hampering the comparison of its biological properties and estimation of its commercial value. This work evaluates the effectiveness of combining maceration and ultrasonication extraction techniques on the yield, total phenol content (Folin-Ciocalteau) and the specific phenolic compounds (HPLC-UV), on propolis from different origins. The extraction method was not significant in any case; therefore ultrasonication is recommended (time-saving) but only when a double extraction is performed. Propolis yield varies significantly between samples, as it includes impurities, consequently the results should be expressed considering the yield (as balsam) instead of raw propolis. Of the 13 quantified phenolic compounds, CAPE and pinocembrin (803 and 701 mg/g balsam) stand out. The phenolic profile of a propolis must be fixed using both total phenol content (with a consensus reference compound) and the specific phenolic compounds, since the latter provides information about compounds that can play a significant antioxidant role.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available