4.7 Article

ANISOTROPY OF THIRD-ORDER STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS IN MHD TURBULENCE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 804, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/119

Keywords

magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); solar wind; turbulence

Funding

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration (SHOCK) [284515]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme [IAP P7/08CHARM]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P209/12/2023]
  4. CINECA [2014 HP10CLF0ZB, HP10CNMQX2M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measure of the third-order structure function, Y, is employed in the solar wind to compute the cascade rate of turbulence. In the absence of a mean field B-0 = 0, Y is expected to be isotropic (radial) and independent of the direction of increments, so its measure yields directly the cascade rate. For turbulence with mean field, as in the solar wind, Y is expected to become more two-dimensional (2D), that is, to have larger perpendicular components, losing the above simple symmetry. To get the cascade rate, one should compute the flux of Y, which is not feasible with single-spacecraft data; thus, measurements rely on assumptions about the unknown symmetry. We use direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence to characterize the anisotropy of Y. We find that for strong guide field B-0 = 5 the degree of two-dimensionalization depends on the relative importance of shear-Alfven and pseudo-Alfven polarizations (the two components of an Alfven mode in incompressible MHD). The anisotropy also shows up in the inertial range. The more Y is 2D, the more the inertial range extent differs along parallel and perpendicular directions. We finally test the two methods employed in observations and find that the so-obtained cascade rate may depend on the angle between B-0 and the direction of increments. Both methods yield a vanishing cascade rate along the parallel direction, contrary to observations, suggesting a weaker anisotropy of solar wind turbulence compared to our DNSs. This could be due to a weaker mean field and/or to solar wind expansion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available