4.7 Article

Several species of Penicillium isolated from chestnut flour processing are pathogenic on fresh chestnuts and produce mycotoxins

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 396-404

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.003

Keywords

Penicillium crustosum; Mycotoxins; Castanea sativa; Indoor; Pathogenicity; Polyphasic identification

Funding

  1. Piedmont Region
  2. AFLACHEST project (PSR FEASR 2007/2013, European Fund for Rural Development, Measure 124, Action 1)
  3. CRT Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A collection of 124 isolates of Penicillium spp. was created by monitoring fresh chestnuts, dried chestnuts, chestnut granulates, chestnut flour and indoor chestnut mills. Sequencing of the ITS region, beta-tubulin and calmodulin, macro-morphology and secondary metabolite production made it possible to determine 20 species of Penicillium. P. bialowiezense was dominant in the fresh chestnuts, while P. crustosum was more frequent in the other sources. A pathogenicity test on chestnut showed that around 70% of the isolates were virulent. P. corylophilum and P. yezoense were not pathogenic, while the other 18 species had at least one virulent isolate. P. expansum and P. crustosum were the most virulent. The isolates were characterized to establish their ability to produce 14 toxic metabolites in vivo: 59% were able to produce at least one mycotoxin. P. expansum was able to produce patulin, chaetoglobosin A and roquefortine, while P. bialowiezense produced C. Mycophenolic acid. Cyclopenins and viridicatins were produced by most of the P. crustosum, P. polonicum, P. solitum and P. discolour isolates. Some of the P. crustosum isolates were also able to produce roquefortine C or penitrem A. Information about the occurrence of Penicillium spp. and their mycotoxins will help producers to set up management procedures that can help to control the fungal growth and the mycotoxin production of chestnuts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available