4.4 Article

Exploring the Potential of Fungal Arylacetonitrilases in Mandelic Acid Synthesis

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 466-474

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-015-9840-y

Keywords

Fungal arylacetonitrilases; (R)-Mandelic acid manufacture; (R,S)-Mandelonitrile hydrolysis; Enantioselectivity; Chemoselectivity; Sequence analysis

Funding

  1. Institute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [P504/11/0394, RVO61388971]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of arylacetonitrilases from filamentous fungi to the hydrolysis of high concentrations of (R, S)-mandelonitrile (100-500 mM) was demonstrated for the first time. Escherichia coli strains expressing the corresponding genes were used as whole-cell catalysts. Nitrilases from Aspergillus niger, Neurospora crassa, Nectria haematococca, and Arthroderma benhamiae (enzymes NitAn, NitNc, NitNh, and NitAb, respectively) exhibited different degrees of enantio-and chemoselectivity (amide formation). Their enantio-and chemoselectivity was increased by increasing pH (from 8 to 9-10) and adding 4-10 % (v/v) toluene as the cosolvent. NitAn and NitNc were able to convert an up to 500 mM substrate in batch mode. NitAn formed a very low amount of the by-product, amide (<1% of the total product). This enzyme produced up to >70 g/L of (R)-mandelic acid (e.e. 94.5-95.6 %) in batch or fed-batch mode. Its volumetric productivities were the highest in batch mode [571 +/- 32 g/(L d)] and its catalyst productivities in fed-batch mode (39.9 +/- 2.5 g/g of dcw). NitAb hydrolyzed both enantiomers of 100 mM (R, S)-mandelonitrile at pH 5.0 and is therefore promising for the enantioretentive transformation of (S)-mandelonitrile. Sequence analysis suggested that fungal arylacetonitrilases with similar properties (enantioselectivity, chemoselectivity) were clustered together.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available