4.7 Article

Chemical components distribution and morphology of microcapsules of paprika oleoresin by microscopy and spectroscopy

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 6-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.005

Keywords

Microstructure; Paprika oleoresin; Components distribution; Wall materials; XPS; Spray drying

Funding

  1. Instituto Politecnico Nacional - Mexico (National Polytechnic Institute) [20170428, 216044]
  2. Program for Professional Teacher Development (PRODEP) [ITESOCEH-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microencapsulates containing oleoresin of paprika (OP) and blends of soy protein isolate (SPI), maltodextrin (MD) and gum arabic (GA) as wall materials, were analysed to evaluate the components distribution developed during the encapsulation process. Encapsulation efficiency, glass transition temperature, flowability and physical properties were also assessed. Focused ion beam coupled to scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), X-ray dispersion spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) allowed identifying the effects of OP into microcapsules, chemical components distribution, and morphology. In microencapsulated OP, the hollow capsules ranged from 8 to 23% and Tgs (near to 83 degrees C and 98 degrees C). The protein concentration on particle surface (18.08%-68.48%) was evaluated by XPS and the surface composition of powders was identified. The best encapsulation efficiency (88.4%) was exhibited by the formulation OP-0.10% SPI-10.45% MD-9.45% GA; the capsules showed the lowest wall thickness and the maximum nitrogen reduction (%) on the particle surface. As a conclusion, OP reduces the presence of hollow capsules and increases the Tg; the soy protein may be responsible for the folds with wide crests on the particle surface, giving a soft and active surface. Although the stability of oleoresin of paprika microencapsulated is associated with the low values of moisture content, a(w), and glass transition temperature, the OP on the external surface, could reduce the protective capacity of any wall material. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available