4.7 Article

The in vitro effect of carvacrol, a food additive, on the pathogenicity of O157 and non-O157 Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 290-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.08.014

Keywords

Shiga toxin producing E. coli; Carvacrol; Cell permeability; ATP; Adhesion; Intestinal cells

Funding

  1. Auranta, Nova UCD, Belfield Innovation Park, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shiga toxin producing Escherichia cell (STEC) are important pathogens implicated in foodborne outbreaks and severe human infections. E. coil O157:H7 is the most common strain amongst STECs however non 0157 STECs have been connected with numerous outbreaks worldwide. The use of natural plant extracts to reduce the risk from foodborne pathogens is gaining increasing importance. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the effect of carvacrol against O157, O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O104 at different concentrations. Changes in membrane permeability, membrane integrity and intracellular ATP levels were determined to further elucidate the possible antimicrobial mechanism. The effect of carvacrol on the phenotypic expression of virulence in terms of adhesion to human intestinal cells was also studied. Carvacrol had potent antibacterial effect against all strains. Treatment with carvacrol at different concentrations significantly affected the cell membrane permeability and reduced intracellular ATP levels for all STECs. It was also shown that exposure of STECs to carvacrol at sub-inhibitory concentrations reduces adherence to intestinal cells. The data presented here offer further insight into the antimicrobial activity of carvacrol and show that it has the potential to be used as a natural food antimicrobial against clinically relevant STECs even at sub-inhibitory concentrations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available