4.7 Article

Bioaccessibility, cellular uptake and transport of luteins and assessment of their antioxidant activities

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 66-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.055

Keywords

Lutein; cis-Isomers; Isomerization; Antioxidant activity; Bioaccessibility; Cellular uptake; Caco-2 cells

Funding

  1. Abase fund of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada [J-000283.001.01]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2017374]
  3. National Key Technology R&D Program for the 13th five-year plan [2017BAD33B05]
  4. Jiangsu province Collaborative Innovation Center for Food Safety and Quality Control industry development program
  5. China Scholarship Council through the Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada-Ministry of Education of China (AAFC-MOE) Ph.D. Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid method for producing 9Z- and 13'Z-isomers from all-E-lutein was developed using I-TiO2 as catalyst. In a simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model, both trans-cis isomerization of all-E-lutein and cis-trans isomerization of Z-luteins occurred during the intestinal phase. The bioaccessibility of all isomers was between 14 and 23%, and it was higher for Z-luteins. In a Caco-2 cell monolayer model, all isomers were relatively stable during cellular uptake and transport across the membrane as no significant isomerization and degradation was detected, but all-E-lutein exhibited significantly higher cellular uptake and transport efficiencies. These results suggest that Z-luteins found in human plasma may likely be formed before intestinal absorption. 13'Z-Lutein also exhibited highest antioxidant activity in FRAP, DPPH and ORAC-L assays, but no significant difference in cell-based antioxidant assay compared with other isomers. Future studies on the different antioxidant activities of cis isomers of lutein in vivo will provide further explanation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available