4.3 Article

Beak identification of four dominant octopus species in the East China Sea based on traditional measurements and geometric morphometrics

Journal

FISHERIES SCIENCE
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages 975-985

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-018-1235-0

Keywords

Octopus; Species identification; Beak measurement; Geometric morphometircs; Machine learning

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC4147129]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610277]
  3. Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources [A1-0203-00-2009-6]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (Fisheries Discipline)
  5. Fund of Key Laboratory of Open-Sea Fishery Development, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China [LOF 2018-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Octopus is the most abundant genus in the family Octopodidae and accounts for more than half of the total cephalopod landing in neritic fisheries. A taxonomic problem still exists due to synonymous scientific names and limited genetic information. The cephalopod beak is a stable structure that allows an effective solution to the problem of the species and stock identification. Beak shape variation has been more widely considered than beak measurements in recent years. In this study, with the beak as the experimental material, we combined geometric morphometrics (GM) with machine learning methods and compared the discrimination results obtained by traditional and GM methods in four Chinese neritic octopus species (Amphioctopus fangsiao, Amphioctopus ovulum, Octopus minor and Octopus sinensis). According to our analyses, Octopus sinensis has the larger beak size [both upper beak (UB) and lower beak (LB)] than other species. The results of ANOVA showed that all beak measurements differed significantly among the four species. Significant differences in both UB and LB shapes among four species were identified in MANOVA analysis based on the GM method. The results of GM-based discriminant analysis were better than those of traditional measurements, and machine learning methods also showed the higher correct classification rates than linear discriminant analysis. GM is a useful method to reconstruct the shape cephalopod beak and can also effectively distinguish different species. We should improve classification accuracy with machine learning methods for determining species structure in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available