4.3 Article

The Hepatitis C treatment experience: Patients' perceptions of the facilitators of and barriers to uptake, adherence and completion

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 987-1004

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1012195

Keywords

treatment adherence; Hepatitis C virus; coping strategies; qualitative research; Hepatitis C treatment

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1003767, 1047417, 1053206]
  2. Robert W. Storr bequest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study explores the perceptions of patients receiving treatment for Hepatitis C to determine what factors influence their decision to commence treatment, ability to maintain adherence and complete their treatment program. Design: Semi-structured interview techniques were used in a qualitative study of 20 patients undergoing treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC). Main outcome measures: To explore patients' perceived barriers and facilitators of Hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion. Results: Analysis of patient interviews identified four key themes: (1) motivations for commencing CHC treatment - fear of death and ridding themselves of stigma and shame; (2) the influential role of provider communication - patients reported that information and feedback that was personalised to their needs and lifestyles was the most effective for improving adherence to treatment; (3) facilitators of treatment adherence and completion - social, emotional and practical support improved adherence and completion, as did temporarily ceasing employment; (4) barriers to treatment adherence and completion - these included side effects, stigma, a complicated dosing schedule and limitations of the public healthcare system. Conclusion: To increase treatment adherence and completion rates, a patient-centred approach is required that addresses patients' social, practical, and emotional support needs and adaptive coping strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available