4.7 Article

An integrated agrometeorological model to simulate Marandu palisade grass productivity

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages 13-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.015

Keywords

Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) brizantha; Degree-days; Base temperature; Radiation-use efficiency; Water balance

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) [475525/2010-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate aspects are important for forage production. Therefore, mathematical models that account for such aspects are useful tools to help decision making and improve pasture management. The objective of this study was to develop and parameterize an agrometeorological model based on solar radiation, temperature and soil water availability to estimate Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) brizantha cv. Marandu production. Such model was parameterized with data from nine growth cycles of an experiment conducted in 2011/2012. For this, base temperature (Tb), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and soil water availability were determined. The model was validated with data from three experiments conducted in 2001/2002, 2009/2010 and 2012 under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Using historical climate data from Sao Carlos (21 degrees 57'S, 47 degrees 50'W, 860 m), and Votuporanga (20 30'S, 49 degrees 59'W, 430 m), both in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil, a sensitivity analysis was performed. During the validation, the biomass estimations presented a R-2 of 0.92, D index of 0.98, mean error of -8.1 kg ha(-1), and RMSE of 360.7 kg ha(-1). Based on the sensitivity analysis, the proposed model was effective to estimate the inter annual and seasonal Marandu palisade grass productivity variability, as a function of solar radiation, temperature and rainfall fluctuations. Therefore, this model can be used as a tool to improve pasture management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available