4.7 Article

Liming and straw retention interact to increase nitrogen uptake and grain yield in a double rice-cropping system

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages 217-224

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.026

Keywords

Crop residue; Subtropical; Enzyme activity; Litter decomposition; Nitrogen availability

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFD0300104, 2017YFD0301605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liming and straw retention are often applied to increase yield in rice cropping systems on acidic soils. Although these practices affect soil fertility and rice growth through different mechanisms, it is still unclear whether or how these two management practices interact. Here we report on the first experiment to study the interaction between liming and straw management practices on rice yield. We conducted a two-year factorial field experiment to investigate the interactive effect of liming and straw retention on rice yield and nitrogen (N) uptake in a double rice-cropping system in subtropical China. We found that straw retention significantly interacted with liming to increase rice yields; without liming, straw retention increased yield by 4.2% on average, whereas with liming, straw retention increased yield by 11.6%. Straw retention also significantly interacted with liming to improve N uptake, with a stronger response for late rice compared to early rice. Liming and straw retention increased soil N availability and the activities of soil enzymes involved in both carbon and N cycling, suggesting increased organic matter decomposition and enhanced N mineralization rates. Across treatments, rice yields significantly correlated with soil N availability. Therefore, we conclude that in this short-term experiment, liming and straw retention interacted to increase rice yield, likely due to their effect on soil fertility and plant N uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available