Journal
FEBS LETTERS
Volume 592, Issue 12, Pages 2098-2107Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.13070
Keywords
mouse model; obesity; thermoneutrality
Funding
- Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NIH
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [ZIADK075062, ZIADK075063, ZIADK075064, ZIADK075057] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Mice are widely used for exploring obesity physiology and treatment. However, thermal biology is different between small and large mammals. In this Review, we discuss how the effect of environmental temperature must be understood to ensure applicability of mouse experiments to human obesity. At ambient environmental temperature (similar to 22 degrees C), over one-third of energy expenditure in mice is devoted to maintaining core body temperature, largely by brown adipose tissue. To conserve this energy, mice can enter a regulated hypothermia, while humans do not. Since humans expend little or no energy specifically to keep warm, mice studied at thermoneutrality (similar to 30 degrees C) may be a better model for human energy homeostasis. Studies indicate that environmental temperature also affects the efficacy of drugs that increase energy expenditure. In mice, dinitrophenol, a protonophore, and CL316243, a 3-adrenergic agonist, both increase metabolic rate at thermoneutrality, but only CL316243 increases it at 22 degrees C. Furthermore, mice housed at thermoneutrality may become more obese than mice at 22 degrees C. Thus, we discuss the importance of studying mice at both thermoneutrality and at lower temperatures in obesity research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available