4.5 Article

Estimation of high-temperature fracture parameters for small punch specimen with a surface crack

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12767

Keywords

C-t-parameter; creep crack growth; small-punch creep test; stress intensity factor; surface crack

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning [2013101010170C, 20142020201850]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [2013101010170C] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20152813260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An outline of a newly proposed methodology for evaluating creep crack growth (CCG) parameters using cracked small-punch (SP) specimens is explained. Three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed to calculate the stress intensity factor along the crack front for a surface crack formed at the centre of a SP specimen. Effects of crack ratio, (a/t); crack aspect ratio, (a/c); and thickness of the specimen, (t), on the fracture parameters were studied. It was observed that the minimum variation of K-value along the crack front can be achieved when a/c was 0.50 except the location very near the intersection of the crack and free surface. This condition is similar to the case of constant K-values along the crack front of the conventional compact tension specimen. Thus, it can be argued that the SP specimen with a surface crack is a suitable specimen geometry for CCG testing. The proposed CCG test method was found to be practically applicable for the crack geometry of 0.10 to 0.30 of a/t with constant aspect ratio of 0.50. An estimation of the K and C-t-parameter under the small scale creep condition was derived. Future work for further development of the suggested CCG testing is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available