4.3 Review

Information and communication technologies for informal carers and paid assistants: benefits from micro-, meso-, and macro-levels

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 163-173

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10433-015-0333-4

Keywords

Quality of life; Quality of care; Efficiency; Cost-effectiveness; Long-term care; Social investment

Categories

Funding

  1. Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology
  2. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission [INFSO/H3/2010/1-JRC 31752-2010-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to explore the benefits of information and communication technologies (ICT)-based services for informal carers and paid assistants of older people living in the community. We cross-case analysed the effects of twelve initiatives in the EU, the USA and Canada, based on their individual analysis documented through interviews with promoters and a literature review. We carried out the cross-case analysis following a variables-oriented strategy on seven dimensions of impact at micro-, meso- and macro-levels: the quality of life of informal carers and paid assistants, quality of life of care recipients, quality of care, care efficiency and sustainability, acceptability, and infrastructure and accessibility. ICT-based services for informal carers and paid assistants improve the quality of life of older people and their carers and access to qualified care. They also generate savings which contribute to the sustainability of the care systems. These findings constitute a first look at the benefits of the use of ICT-based services for informal carers and paid assistants. Nevertheless, more research using experimental methods is needed to demonstrate the impact of these ICT-based services at meso- and macro-levels. This would help to support policy-makers to deploy these technologies for long-term care delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available