4.2 Article

Accelerating CALYPSO structure prediction by data-driven learning of a potential energy surface

Journal

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages 31-43

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8fd00055g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11534003, 11604117, 11404128, 61775081]
  2. Science Challenge Project [TZ2016001]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0201200]
  4. Program for JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ab initio structure prediction methods have been nowadays widely used as powerful tools for structure searches and materials discovery. However, they are generally restricted to small systems owing to the heavy computational cost of the underlying density functional theory (DFT) calculations in structure optimizations. In this work, by combining a state-of-art machine learning (ML) potential with our in-house developed CALYPSO structure prediction method, we developed two acceleration schemes for the structure prediction of large systems, in which a ML potential is pre-constructed to fully replace DFT calculations or trained in an on-the-fly manner from scratch during the structure searches. The developed schemes have been applied to medium- and large-sized boron clusters, both of which are challenging cases for either the construction of ML potentials or extensive structure searches. Experimental structures of B-36 and B-40 clusters can be readily reproduced, and the putative global minimum structure for the B-84 cluster is proposed, where the computational cost is substantially reduced by approximate to 1-2 orders of magnitude if compared with full DFT-based structure searches. Our results demonstrate a viable route for structure prediction in large systems via the combination of state-of-art structure prediction methods and ML techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available