4.6 Article

Microbial keratitis in corneal grafts: predisposing factors and outcomes

Journal

EYE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 775-781

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.310

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To identify the nature of microbial keratitis in corneal grafts and the clinical outcomes at a tertiary hospital in the United Kingdom. Patients and methods A retrospective case series of microbial keratitis in corneal grafts at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne over a 17-year period (1997-2014). Results A total of 759 consecutive corneal grafts were identified from the Cornea Transplantation database. Of these, 59 episodes of microbial keratitis occurred in 41 eyes of 41 patients (5.4%; 19 male, 46.3%). Median patient age was 73 years (SD=19.4 years). The most common indication for corneal transplantation was bullous keratopathy (11/41, 26.8%). There were 34/59 (57.6%) episodes of culture-positive graft keratitis; Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were each isolated in 5/34 (14.7%) culture-positive episodes. In all, 35/59 (59.3%) episodes of microbial keratitis occurred in 22 previously failed grafts and 3 de novo graft failures. Gram-negative keratitis was more likely to cause reduced BCVA after (chi(2)-test, P=0.02). Median graft duration was 49.5 months (SD=43.7 months). Failed grafts were significantly older (median 69 vs 27 months, P=0.009). Conclusion This represents the longest published follow-up data on microbial keratitis and is the only of its kind in the United Kingdom. The incidence of 5.4% is comparable to that within the developed world. Graft age was significantly associated with graft failure in microbial keratitis; the ongoing risk of microbial keratitis warrants providing patients with long-term open access to hospital eye services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available