4.4 Article

Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 435-443

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1471989

Keywords

High dose influenza vaccine; influenza; seniors; elderly; efficacy; effectiveness; hospitalization; death; systematic review; meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Influenza is responsible for a significant disease burden annually, especially in older adults. This study reviews the relative vaccine efficacy or effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (HD-IIV3) compared to standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD-IIV3) in adults 65 against influenza-associated outcomes to inform evidence-based decision-making to shift clinical practice and standard of care in this population.Methods: A systematic review was conducted for studies assessing the rVE of HD-IIV3 against probable/laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (ILI), hospital admissions, and death in adults 65. Results from individual seasons were meta-analyzed and a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled rVEs.Results: After screening 992 studies, seven studies were meta-analyzed. HD-IIV3 demonstrated better protection against ILI compared to SD-IIV3 (rVE=19.5%; 95% CI: 8.6-29.0%). HD-IIV3 was also more effective at preventing hospital admissions from all-causes (rVE=9.1%; 95% CI: 2.4-15.3%), as well as from influenza (rVE=17.8%; 95% CI: 8.1-26.5%), pneumonia (rVE=24.3%, 95% CI: 13.9-33.4%), and cardiorespiratory events (rVE=18.2%; 95% CI: 6.8-28.1%). rVE against post-influenza mortality was 22.2% (95% CI: -18.2-48.8%) and 2.5% (95% CI: -5.2-9.5%) against all-cause mortality.Conclusions: Available evidence suggests HD-IIV3 is more effective than SD-IIV3 at reducing the clinical outcomes associated with influenza infection in older adults and should be considered for routine use in the 65+ population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available