4.6 Article

Effect of h-BN coating on nucleate boiling heat transfer performance in pool boiling

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 12-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.05.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [NRF-2017M2A8A4018582]
  2. Incheon National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M2A8A4018582] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a simple and efficient surface modulation method for enhancing boiling heat transfer performance using a commercial spray can of boron nitride (h-BN). The surface was prepared by successive spraying, drying, and annealing, resulting in a thin coating of film composed of closely packed h-BN particles. We controlled the thickness of the coating by varying the number of repetitions of the spraying and drying steps, and evaluated the effects on boiling performance. We observed a trade-off between the boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and the critical heat flux (CHF) as the thickness varied. We obtained the largest improvement from the thinnest b-BN coating, at 8 gm, which yielded an HTC enhancement of 160% compared with the uncoated silicon surface. We obtained a similar improvement to the CHF. Meanwhile, the surface coated with the thickest layer, 27 tun of h-BN, exhibited the largest CHF enhancement, 70%, but the worst HTC performance, increasing the HTC of the silicon wafer only by 9%. We attributed the enhancement in the HTC performance to the higher nucleate site density on the h-BN coated surface. However, the thermal properties of the surface were worse than those of uncoated silicon, leading to degradation in the HTC with increasing thickness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available