4.4 Article

Polymerase matters: non-proofreading enzymes inflate fungal community richness estimates by up to 15 %

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 86-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.03.003

Keywords

Community composition; DNA polymerase; Fungal communities; Proofreading; Richness

Funding

  1. USDA Forest Service Cooperative Agreement [11-CA-11330136-126]
  2. DOE [DE-SC0004953]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF DGE-0841414]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [GRANTS:14049308, 1429316] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1331846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rare taxa overwhelm metabarcoding data generated using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Low frequency Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) may be artifacts generated by PCR-amplification errors resulting from polymerase mispairing. We analyzed two Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) MiSeq libraries generated with proofreading (Thermo Scientific Phusion (R)) and non-proofreading (Thermo Scientific Phire (R)) polymerases from the same MiSeq reaction, the same samples, using the same DNA tags, and with two different clustering methods to evaluate the effect of polymerase and clustering tool choices on the estimates of richness, diversity and community composition. Our data show that, while the overall communities are comparable, OTU richness is exaggerated by the use of the non-proofreading polymerase-up to 15 % depending on the clustering method, and on the threshold of low frequency OTU removal. The overestimation of richness also consistently led to underestimation of community evenness, a result of increase in the low frequency OTUs. Stringent thresholds of eliminating the rare reads remedy this issue; exclusion of reads that occurred <= 10 times reduced overestimated OTU numbers to <0.3 %. As a result of these findings, we strongly recommend the use of proofreading polymerases to improve the data integrity as well as the use of stringent culling thresholds for rare sequences to minimize overestimation of community richness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available