4.2 Article

Functional analysis of Fanconi anemia mutations in China

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 32-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.07.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shen-kang Frontier Joint Research Project [SHDC12014118]
  2. Ai You Angel Research foundation
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81601869]
  4. Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [20154Y0027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare recessive disease characterized by progressive bone marrow failure, congenital abnormalities, and increased incidence of cancers. To date, mutations in 22 genes can cause FA or an FA-like phenotype. In China, in addition to clinical information, FA diagnosis primarily relies on genetic sequencing because the chromosome breakage test is rarely performed. Here, we employed multiple genetic diagnostic tools (DNA sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and chromosome microarray) and a variant-based functional assay platform to investigate the genetic cause in 25 Chinese suspected FA patients. A total of 45 distinct candidate variants were detected in six FA genes (FA-A, FA-B, FA-C, FA-D2, FA-G, and FA-J), of which 36 were novel. Eight missense variants and one indel variant were unable to restore FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and mitomycin C resistance in a panel of FA indicator cell lines, indicating that these mutations are deleterious. Three missense variants (FANCA-L424V, FANCC-E273K, and FANCG-A153G) were harmless. Finally, 23 patients were molecularly diagnosed with FA, consistent with their clinical phenotype. In the FA-A subgroup, large deletions accounted for 14% of the disease causing variants. We have established a comprehensive molecular diagnostic workflow for Chinese FA patients that can substitute for standard FA cytogenetic analysis. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available