4.4 Article

Microscopy- or DNA-based analyses: Which methodology gives a truer picture of stream-dwelling decomposer fungal diversity?

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 130-134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.08.005

Keywords

Aquatic hyphomycetes; Streams; Diversity; 454 pyrosequencing; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Fungal spores morphology

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund - Operational Competitiveness Programme (FEDER-POFC-COMPETE) [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-013954]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for the Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/BIA/04050/2013, PTDC/AAC-AMB/113746/2009]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/97656/2013, SFRH/BPD/47574/2008]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/47574/2008, Incentivo/BIA/UI4050/2014, SFRH/BPD/97656/2013, PTDC/AAC-AMB/113746/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed aquatic hyphomycete diversity in autumn and spring on oak leaves decomposing in five streams along a gradient of eutrophication in the Northwest of Portugal. Diversity was assessed through microscopy-based (identification by spore morphology) and DNA-based techniques (Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and 454 pyrosequencing). Pyrosequencing revealed five times greater diversity than DGGE. About 21% of all aquatic hyphomycete species were exclusively detected by pyrosequencing and 26% exclusively by spore identification. In some streams, more than half of the recorded species would have remained undetected if we had relied only on spore identification. Nevertheless, in spring aquatic hyphomycete diversity was higher based on spore identification, probably because many species occurring in this season are not yet connected to ITS barcodes in genetic databases. Pyrosequencing was a powerful tool for revealing aquatic hyphomycete diversity on decomposing plant litter in streams and we strongly encourage researchers to continue the effort in barcoding fungal species. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available