4.6 Article

Tunneling or Not? The Change of Legal Environment on the Effect of Post-Privatization Performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages 491-510

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2169-9

Keywords

Tunneling; Privatization; Investor protection; Law and finance; Ethics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71232004, 71172083, 71272087]
  2. CEIBS Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by Hoff and Stiglitz's (Am Econ Rev 94(3):753-763, 2004) theory, we examine empirically how the creation of rules of the game affect the behavior of economic agents in a transition economy. Using a sample of Chinese state-owned enterprises in which controlling ownership was transferred to private acquirers between 1994 and 2006, we find that the post-privatization performance (PPP) of firms depends on institutional factors. Before 2003, we observe severe post-privatization tunneling behaviors by acquirers and worse PPP. However, from 2003, when the State issued regulations against tunneling and strengthened enforcement, the incidence of tunneling behaviors declined, and PPP improved. We find that better implementation of ownership transfer and longer prior experience of private acquirers are key factors that contribute to the improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available