4.8 Article

Advancing societal readiness toward renewable energy system adoption with a socio-technical perspective

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 170-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.016

Keywords

Renewable energy; Technology adoption; Socio-technical perspective; Sustainable innovation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012S1A5A2A01019597]
  2. KAIST [2013-1-2]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012S1A5A2A01019597] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of renewable energy systems has put a large emphasis on technical progress rather than examination of ways to foster societal demand to diffuse the new energy technologies. In order to understand demand-side issues that are important to sustainable energy innovation, this research examines key factors of renewable energy systems diffusion from a socio-technological perspective. Based on theory of planned behavior (TPB), a research model was constructed around societal factors such as social trust and social support alongside technology issues such as technical facilitating conditions and perceived system quality. This research reveals that attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control impact on consumers' intention to use renewable energy systems. In addition, social trust and social support are influential factors on attitude and subjective norm while facilitating technical condition has influence on perceived behavioral control. The findings of this study suggest that business managers and policy makers should have a strategy to advance societal readiness toward sustainable energy innovation and to balance it with technology development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available