4.3 Article

Cyber Hate Speech on Twitter: An Application of Machine Classification and Statistical Modeling for Policy and Decision Making

Journal

POLICY AND INTERNET
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 223-242

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/poi3.85

Keywords

Twitter; hate speech; Internet; policy; machine classification; statistical modeling; cyber hate; ensemble classifier

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council
  2. Google Data Analytics Research Grant [ES/K008013/1]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/F035098/1, ES/K008013/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. ESRC [ES/F035098/1, ES/K008013/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of Big Data in policy and decision making is a current topic of debate. The 2013 murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich, London, UK led to an extensive public reaction on social media, providing the opportunity to study the spread of online hate speech (cyber hate) on Twitter. Human annotated Twitter data was collected in the immediate aftermath of Rigby's murder to train and test a supervised machine learning text classifier that distinguishes between hateful and/or antagonistic responses with a focus on race, ethnicity, or religion; and more general responses. Classification features were derived from the content of each tweet, including grammatical dependencies between words to recognize othering phrases, incitement to respond with antagonistic action, and claims of well-founded or justified discrimination against social groups. The results of the classifier were optimal using a combination of probabilistic, rule-based, and spatial-based classifiers with a voted ensemble meta-classifier. We demonstrate how the results of the classifier can be robustly utilized in a statistical model used to forecast the likely spread of cyber hate in a sample of Twitter data. The applications to policy and decision making are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available