4.5 Article

Risk analysis for container shipping: from a logistics perspective

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 147-171

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-07-2012-0068

Keywords

Empirical research; Risk identification; Container shipping; Logistics operations; Risk analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore and analyse the risks in container shipping operations from a logistics perspective. In the paper, risks associated with the three flows in logistics information, physical, and payment flow are identified and analysed. Design/methodology/approach - The use of case study method was first explained and justified. Second, risk identification was started with supporting references, several interviews were then conducted to identify and validate the potential risks in container shipping operations. A questionnaire was deployed to collect related data; and the impacts of the risks were then assessed and ranked using the method of risk mapping. Findings - The paper has identified a total of 35 risk factors and classified them into different categories. The paper has also revealed that the risks associated with physical flows have more serious risk impacts than the other types of risks; however, one of the risk factors associated with information flow (shippers hiding cargo information) is the most significant one among all the factors. Originality/value - Although many studies have been conducted on container shipping operational risks, no studies so far have approached this issue from a perspective that inclusively examines all the possible risks and comprehensively evaluates the relative importance of each of them. This study has identified the risks in container shipping operations, and analysed and ranked the level of these risks. The research further refines the findings of some previous studies by placing the risk factors addressed therein in a full risk picture which was developed systematically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available