4.6 Article

Atorvastatin Versus Placebo for Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy-A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages 697-701

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.037

Keywords

Atorvastatin; Clinical trial; Inflammation; Ki-67; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen

Funding

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  2. Expert Responsibility Area of the Tampere University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We tested whether intervention with atorvastatin affects the prostate beneficially compared with placebo in men with prostate cancer in a randomized clinical trial. A total of 160 statin-naive prostate cancer patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy were randomized to use 80 mg atorvastatin or placebo daily from recruitment to surgery for a median of 27 d. Blinding was maintained throughout the trial. In total, 158 men completed the follow-up, with 96% compliance. Overall, atorvastatin did not significantly lower tumor proliferation index Ki-67 or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) compared with placebo. In subgroup analyses, after a minimum of 28 d of atorvastatin use, Ki-67 was 14.1% lower compared with placebo (p = 0.056). Among high-grade cases (International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grade 3 or higher), atorvastatin lowered PSA compared with placebo: median change -0.6 ng/ml; p = 0.024. Intraprostatic inflammation did not differ between the study arms (p = 0.8). Despite a negative overall result showing no effect of statins on Ki67 or PSA overall, in post hoc exploratory analyses, there appeared to be benefit after a minimum duration of 28 d. Further studies are needed to verify this. Patient summary: Cholesterol-lowering atorvastatin does not lower prostate cancer proliferation rate compared with placebo overall, but exploratory analyses suggest a benefit in longer exposure. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available