Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study
Stefanie Mangold et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2016)
Recent Update on Radiation Dose Assessment for the State-of-the-Art Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Protocols
Sock Keow Tan et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
CT Evaluation of Small-Diameter Coronary Artery Stents: Effect of an Integrated Circuit Detector with Iterative Reconstruction
Lucas L. Geyer et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
Coronary stent occlusion: reverse attenuation gradient sign observed at computed tomography angiography improves diagnostic performance
Minghua Li et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2015)
Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: Findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography
Nan Xu et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2014)
Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents
Tobias Gassenmaier et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2014)
Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography
Jingwei Pan et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2013)
Stenosis Quantification in Coronary CT Angiography Impact of an Integrated Circuit Detector With Iterative Reconstruction
Fabian Morsbach et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2013)
In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not?
Jiayin Zhang et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING (2012)
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Allen J. Taylor et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2010)
A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents
Sudhir Rathore et al.
EUROINTERVENTION (2010)
Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents:: a collaborative network meta-analysis
Christoph Stettler et al.
LANCET (2007)
Bare metal stent restenosis is not a benign clinical entity
Michael S. Chen et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2006)
64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography:: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents
D Maintz et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2006)
Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries
M Ferencik et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2006)
A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease
GW Stone et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2004)
Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery
JW Moses et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2003)
New frontiers in cardiology - Drug-eluting stents: Part I
JE Sousa et al.
CIRCULATION (2003)
In-stent restenosis: Long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty
I Bossi et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2000)