4.7 Article

To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 2328-2335

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5165-5

Keywords

Confidentiality; Database; Data sharing; Information dissemination; Radiology

Funding

  1. IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
  2. Italian Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this paper are to illustrate the trend towards data sharing, i.e. the regulated availability of the original patient-level data obtained during a study, and to discuss the expected advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of data sharing in radiological research. Expected pros include the potential for verification of original results with alternative or supplementary analyses (including estimation of reproducibility), advancement of knowledge by providing new results by testing new hypotheses (not explored by the original authors) on pre-existing databases, larger scale analyses based on individual-patient data, enhanced multidisciplinary cooperation, reduced publication of false studies, improved clinical practice, and reduced cost and time for clinical research. Expected cons are outlined as the risk that the original authors could not exploit the entire potential of the data they obtained, possible failures in patients' privacy protection, technical barriers such as the lack of standard formats, and possible data misinterpretation. Finally, open issues regarding data ownership, the role of individual patients, advocacy groups and funding institutions in decision making about sharing of data and images are discussed. aEuro cent Regulated availability of patient-level data of published clinical studies (data-sharing) is expected. aEuro cent Expected benefits include verification/advancement of knowledge, reduced cost/time of research, clinical improvement. aEuro cent Potential drawbacks include faults in patients' identity protection and data misinterpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available