4.7 Article

Extraction of |Vcd|and|Vcs| from experimental decay rates using lattice QCDD → πKlνD → π(K)lνform factors

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5943-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SCOAP3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements vertical bar V-cd vertical bar an vertical bar d V-cs vertical bar obtained by combining the momentum dependence of the semileptonic vector form factors f(+)(D ->pi)(q2) and f(+)(D -> K)(q2) , recently determined from lattice QCD simulations, with the differential rates measured for the semileptonic D -> pi l nu and D -> Kl nu decays. Our analysis is based on the results for the semileptonic form factors produced by the European Twisted Mass Collaboration with N-f = 2 + 1+ 1 flavors of dynamical quarks in the whole range of values of the squared 4-momentum transfer accessible in the experiments. The statistical and systematic correlations between the lattice data as well as those present in the experimental data are properly taken into account. With respect to the standard procedure based on the use of only the vector form factor at zero 4-momentum transfer, we obtain more precise and consistent results: vertical bar V-cd vertical bar = 0.2341 (74) and vertical bar V-cs vertical bar = 0.970 (33) . The second-row CKM unitarity is fulfilled within the current uncertainties: vertical bar V-cd vertical bar(2) + &(2)+vertical bar V-cb vertical bar(2)= 0.996 (64) . Moreover, using for the first time hadronic inputs determined from first principles, we have calculated the ratio of the semileptonic D -> pi(K) decay rates into muons and electrons, which represent a test of lepton universality within the SM, obtaining in the isospin-symmetric limit of QCD: R-LU(D pi) = 0.985 (2) and R-LU(DK) = 0.975 (1) .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available