4.5 Article

Over-scanning in chest CT: Comparison of practice among six hospitals and its impact on radiation dose

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 49-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.005

Keywords

Radiation exposure; Radiation monitoring; Thorax; Multidetector computed tomography; Over-scanning

Funding

  1. Swiss Society of Radiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Compare incidence of over-scanning in chest CT among six hospitals and impact on effective and organ effective radiation dose. Methods: Scout images of 600 chest CTs from six hospitals (A-F) were retrospectively reviewed using a radiation dose tracking software (RTS). Optimal scan range was determined and compared to the actual scan range. Incidence of cranial and caudal over-scanning was assessed and changes in total and organ effective dose were calculated. Descriptive statistics, Tukey- and Wilcoxon matched pairs test were applied. Results: Simultaneous cranial and caudal over-scanning occurred in 29 of 600 scans (A = 0%, B = 1%, C = 12%, D = 3%, E = 11%, F = 2%). Effective radiation dose increased on average by 0.29 mSv (P < 0.001). Cranial over-scanning was observed in 45 of 600 scans (A = 0%, B = 8%, C = 2%, D = 15%, E = 17%, F = 3%) and increased organ effective dose by 0.35 mSv in the thyroid gland (P < 0.001). Caudal over-scanning occurred in 147 of 600 scans (A = 7%, B = 9%, C = 35%, D = 4%, E = 32%, F = 60%) and increased organ effective doses in the upper abdomen by up to 14% (P < 0.001 for all organs). Conclusions: Substantial differences in the incidence of over-scanning in chest CT exist among different hospitals. These differences result in excessive effective radiation dose and increased individual organ effective doses in patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available