4.7 Article

Evaluation of black liquor gasification intended for synthetic fuel or power production

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 216-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.050

Keywords

Biomass; Black liquor; Gasification; Biofuel production; Power production

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Biomass Gasification Center (SFC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of a high-temperature pressurized black liquor gasifier intended for fuel or power production was evaluated both by thermochemical equilibrium calculations and with experiments performed in a development plant with a maximum capacity corresponding to 3 MWth. The aim of this paper was to investigate how the energy efficiency and the performance of the gasifier change with desired use of the syngas and to provide an accurate process analysis which can be used in future work for process optimization and understanding. Experiments in the plant were performed for an oxygen equivalence ratio (lambda) between 0.414-0.462 at two system pressures, 24.6 and 28.7 bar, respectively. The thermal load on the gasifier was 2.7 MWth during the experiments. The experimentally verified cold gas efficiency taking into account all gaseous species varied between 59.0-62.4%. However, if only CO and H-2 (which are the effective molecules for synthetic fuel production) were taken into account; the cold gas efficiency decreased considerably to 53.7-55.4% due to the presence of CH4 in the gas. The results indicate that optimal performance for synthetic fuel production occurs at a higher lambda compared to power production. There is also a potential to further improve the performance for an optimal operated commercial plant in the future since the theoretical results indicate that the cold gas efficiency could be as high as 68.8% (lambda = 035) for fuel production and 81.7% (lambda = 0.27) for power production. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available