4.7 Article

Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 190-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.05.003

Keywords

Consumer preference; Lifestyle; Electric vehicle; Preference heterogeneity; Cluster analysis; Latent class analysis; Discrete choice model

Categories

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  2. Natural Resources Canada
  3. Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS)
  4. BC Hydro

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We characterize heterogeneity in preferences and motivations regarding plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs)-including plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs). Using survey data collected from 1754 new vehicle buying households in Canada in 2013, we segment respondents using two approaches that prove to be complementary. Preference-based segments were constructed using latent-class analysis of discrete choice experiment data. Potential PEV buyers were split into a PEV-enthusiast segment (8% of the sample) with extremely high valuation of PEVs and a broader PHEV-oriented segment (25%) that expressed moderately positive valuation of PHEVs. Preference-based segments also varied by respondents' valuation of specific attributes such as fuel savings. Our second approach constructed lifestyle-based segments using cluster analysis on a subset of potential early PEV buyers (33% of the total sample). The six lifestyle-based clusters varied in engagement in environment- and technology-oriented lifestyles, environmental concern and openness to change. Overall preferences were fairly similar across the dusters, though apparent motivations varied substantially by cluster as indicated by their differing engagement in lifestyles and environmental concern. Taken together, both approaches suggest that PHEVs are the most likely PEV to have broad market appeal and that car buyers have high degrees of heterogeneity in both preferences and motivations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available