4.7 Article

An efficient three-level heuristic for the large-scaled multi-product production routing problem with outsourcing

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 272, Issue 3, Pages 914-927

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.018

Keywords

Supply chain management; Production routing; Multi-product; Outsourcing; Three-level matheuristic

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571061, 71701049]
  2. PHC Cai Yuanpei Program [34644SB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A classic production routing problem (PRP), in which a plant produces and distributes a single product to a set of customers over a finite time horizon, consists of planning simultaneously the production, inventory and routing activities to minimize the total cost. The last few decades have witnessed the increasing efforts made to solve such a complex problem. In this paper, we investigate a generalized PRP by considering multiple products and outsourcing (MPRP-OS). The newly studied problem is first formulated into a mixed integer linear program. Then a three-level mathematical-programming-based heuristic called TLH is developed to solve it. TLH combines a two-phase iterative method, a repairing strategy and a fix-and optimize procedure to find near-optimal solutions. In addition, it is adaptable to solve the classic PRP. Computational experiments on 225 newly generated MPRP-OS instances with up to 200 customers, 20 vehicles, 6 periods and 12 products show the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed heuristic. The performance of TLH is further demonstrated by testing 1530 classic PRP benchmark instances with up to 200 customers, 13 vehicles and 20 periods. Experimental results indicate that TLH is able to solve large sized MPRP-OS instances within short computation times. In addition, TLH provides new best solutions for 283 out of 1530 benchmark instances. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available